current issue archive message boards search
current issue
June 2001




Current Features
Death Row TV
Publishing Your Own E-Books
NASCAR Spins Out
Harlequin Goes Gritty For Growth
Crossing the Pond
Cult of Bloomberg
Everyone's a Critic
One Publisher's Taxing Crusade
Publish Thyself!
Journal Gyrations
Current Issue
Recent Headlines
Books Boutique
Reader Feedback
Corrections
Search Brill's Content

October 1998
Privacy: CNN vs. MSNBC



By

What happens when A family's right to privacy conflicts with the public's right to know? It may depend on which network you're watching. On July 24, U.S. Capitol police detective John Gibson and officer Jacob Chestnut were fatally shot when a gunman opened fire in the U.S. Capitol. Both CNN and MSNBC learned of the shooting before Chestnut's family did, but the two news networks handled the information differently.

Even before CNN was sure of Chestnut's identity, anchor Bernard Shaw hastened to explain that they had a moral obligation not to reveal it. Interrupting correspondent Brooks Jackson, Shaw announced that "apparently one of the wounded officers' family has not been told...and, because of that, it would be obscene for us to be reporting the man's name with his wife and children and relatives not knowing that he has been injured." Later in the same broadcast, Shaw reiterated CNN's position: "We had to back off reporting one name we had because we...had learned that the officer's family had not been notified. So obviously, out of decency, we would not report that name."

Meanwhile, on MSNBC, NBC's Washington bureau chief, Tim Russert, went on the air during Tom Brokaw's "NBC News Special Report" to announce that "a source close to the Capitol Police" had called him to describe what had occurred. Russert relayed the source's description, complete with the identity of both officers. Moments later, as if to drive home the point that information trumps privacy concerns, NBC cut to live footage of a patient being unloaded from a medical helicopter. The cameras followed the patient and paramedics into the hospital emergency room, while Brokaw narrated: "This is the medevac helicopter arriving at the hospital. We believe that one of those gurneys contains one of the officers that was shot, either Officer Gibson or Officer Chestnut...we're looking at live pictures from the hospital."

But it appears that NBC had chased the wrong ambulance. Only one shooting victim had been airlifted from the Capitol; NBC's footage showed an officer being loaded onto a blue-and-white U.S. Park Police helicopter on Capitol Hill; the patient at the hospital, meanwhile, was unloaded from a red-and-white helicopter. Further suspicions were aroused in the ER: as the cameras turned away from hospital staffers treating a patient, a barely audible off-camera voice could be heard saying "that last transport was not a shooting victim. That was..." before the feed abruptly cut out. "We've lost that now," said Brokaw. "They were right in the emergency room."

Through NBC spokeswoman Barbara Levin, Tim Russert, Tom Brokaw, and Beth O'Connell, the network's executive producer of specials, all declined to comment. Through Steve Haworth, CNN's vice-president of public relations, news division, Shaw also declined to comment.

Haworth, however, is less reticent. He doesn't characterize MSNBC's decision as indecent or obscene, but says he believes it is "widespread journalistic practice" to withhold the names of victims until their families are told. Haworth will not comment specifically on NBC's decision to bring cameras into the emergency room. "It seems to me fairly self-evident that there are times when a viewer or reader's right to know must be tempered with other mores," he says. In the case of the Capitol shooting, "you weigh the public's right to know against the right of the family to have some amount of privacy."




Have an opinion about what you just read?
Join the discussion on our message boards.
a letter to the editor.
We post some of the letters we receive, and may edit for length and clarity. Please tell us if you don't want us to share yours.
Contentville

subscribe
SPECIAL OFFER:
FREE SUBSCRIPTION

Spend $25 on anything at Contentville and get a free subscription to Brill's Content magazine, plus a membership in the Citizens' Club, which gives you a 5% discount off already-low prices. Shop NOW and get your FREE subscription! more info

Feedback
DISCUSS this article on the message boards.
a letter to the editor.
READ recent feedback.


Free Brill's Content
Email Newsletter